Editorial Policy
Our editorial method prioritizes clear page purpose, primary-source evidence for consequential claims, explicit publisher/operator separation, and updates when fast-changing facts materially change.
1. Evidence before prose
Licence, bonus, payments, KYC, withdrawal and other consequential claims are researched before publication. Primary operator or regulatory material is preferred where available.
2. Fact vs analysis
External facts should be distinguishable from editorial interpretation, comparisons and recommendations. Unverified claims should not be presented as established fact.
3. Passage clarity
Important sections are written so short passages remain understandable when read independently, with the relevant entity and qualification stated clearly.
Fast-changing information
Promotions, supported cryptocurrencies, payment networks, verification procedures and product features can change. These claims are treated as time-sensitive and should be rechecked after material operator updates.
Corrections and conflicts
If primary sources conflict, the page should disclose the uncertainty accurately or omit the disputed claim until it can be supported. Cross-page factual conflicts are treated as errors rather than as harmless variations.